Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info
MMD > Archives > February 1997 > 1997.02.10 > 16Prev  Next


MMD Editorial Practices
By Phil Benson

The current comments on editorial policy are interesting in that it proves what I've always known: everyone wants something different.

As the editor of The Key Frame for FOPS, I try to keep my comments within, or connected with, letters or articles very short and only to clarify a point being made or to correct an obvious mistake on the part of a letter writer who may, say, have simply mis-read another author's letter or article. (I fail to resist the urge occasionally, but only ever with people I know personally!) In most cases, they know more about their subject than I do, anyway.

I do have a section of the magazine to myself, however, called "Comment", which can be flippant or serious (depending on the circumstances and the level of annoyance or humour I'm feeling at the time) but it's always (I hope) relevant to the work of the Society, the running of the magazine, or about the members. I tend to cover aspects of the Society that are a little "dodgy", too -- the sort of thing the "silent majority" would love to comment on, and indeed do so verbally, but are reluctant, or too polite, to put it into writing. I'm not exactly bashful and can use a wooden spoon with some skill.

The MMD seems, to me, to be a completely different platform. Unlike many society publications, reflecting the policy of the society, it is a forum in the classical sense of a meeting place, albeit we don't actually touch hands; a market place, a place for discussion and debate. (Perhaps we should draw a veil over the "court" and "tribunal" parts of the Concise English Dictionary's definition). As contributors to this forum, perhaps we should take for granted the hecklers who are bound to walk into the square just as we get into our pontifical stride and remind us that we are seldom really as important as we think we are. They have been a part of debate for centuries; they are commentators, they are "editors".

Pontification over, I would suggest that Jody and Robbie have it about right and should continue their excellent work as moderators, comment- ators, editors and hecklers for the benefit of the mere mortals among us and to the frustration of others. After all, unlike the printed word, if I don't like what they say in the MMD I can simply "Ctrl+X" their opinions to oblivion!

As I said at the beginning, everyone wants something different. I like it the way it is, thanks. Anyway, I'm just a new boy - what do I know?

Phil Benson


(Message sent Tue 11 Feb 1997, 00:01:49 GMT, from time zone GMT-0500.)

Key Words in Subject:  Editorial, MMD, Practices

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page