Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

Spring Fundraising Drive In Progress. Please visit our home page to see this and other announcements: https://www.mmdigest.com     Thank you. --Jody

MMD > Archives > February 1997 > 1997.02.10 > 19Prev  Next


Converting MIDI to Duo-Art
By Richard Vance

Mr. Waring's idea about converting digital piano recordings into reproducing rolls is intriguing, but it may not be easy to do. The dynamic coding on a roll is not a straightforward replica of a theoreti- cal curve representing the relative loudness of each note, as might be the case in a modern electronic system. Roll editors had to use all sorts of tricks, based on long experience and musical judgment, to compensate for the actual behavior of the piano, in order to make the end product come out right.

This process has been extensively commented on in the AMICA Bulletin by modern roll editors. Only one example is the problem (inelegantly called "droop" in pneumatic control theory) where the theoretical "setpoint" of a pressure regulator differs from the actual output pressure as a function of the load -- the number and loudness of notes being controlled. This is must be an especially vexing problem for the Duo-Art editor.

I don't know if any progress has been made to do these compensations by computer rather than by human judgment, but such a program would have to be complex, because there are many complex phenomena in a reproducing piano which have to be allowed for.

Another example of this problem is the placement in time of the punched coding, to compensate for the time delays inherent in a mechanical system. The preset for the binary regulators [the Accompaniment channels] in a Duo-Art is proactive and may not be time-critical in the short term, but the proper position and duration of the snakebite (the accent command) surely must be.

I personally think that one of the editing tricks in the original rolls was to place a single lagging snakebite against a note or chord, producing a subtle partial accent of the note. On old pneumatically scanned recuts, single snakebites ended up 2 or 3 punches long, obliterating that subtlety, and contributing to the "muddiness" of musical effect observed in some recuts when compared with the original.

Richard Vance

[ We have several folks here concerned with this topic, and I think
[ there still exists an un-moderated listserver which Jody created for
[ discussion. Perhaps we can revive it.


(Message sent Mon 10 Feb 1997, 02:36:20 GMT, from time zone GMT.)

Key Words in Subject:  Converting, Duo-Art, MIDI

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page