Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

Announcement: End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress

Our End-Of-Year Fundraising drive is in progress. If you haven't contributed to the operation of the MMD in the last 12 months, this would be a great time to contribute. There's a PayPal link at the bottom of each page on the website.

If you aren't sure when you last contributed, please send me a note using the contact form at the bottom of this page and I'll look you up in my records.

Thank you for your generous support!
Jody

P.S. While your support is needed and appreciated, you do not need to contribute to be a subscriber. If you have subscribed and aren't receiving your Digest, please use the contact form at the bottom of the page and let me know. Thanks!

MMD > Archives > January 2012 > 2012.01.25 > 04Prev  Next


Copyrighting a Piano Roll
By Matthew Caulfield

In trying to understand the history of U.S. Federal copyright law, one
has to consider the two major copyright acts governing copyright during
our lifetime: the Copyright Act of 1909 and the Copyright Act of 1976.

The 1909 law did not allow for copyrighting sound recordings such as
piano rolls, but fortunately the 1909 act has been superseded by the
1976 act, which does make sound recordings copyrightable.  For the
basic elements of both acts and to understand the differences between
them, look at the Wikipedia articles about both.   However if you
aren't concerned about pre-1976 creations, you can forget about the
1909 law.

The fact that sound recordings were not eligible for copyright until
the 1976 law made them so was a doctrine established by the famous
White-Smith vs. Apollo case, tried before the U.S. Supreme Court and
decided in 1908 (again see Wikipedia for that case).

The Supreme Court held that, since sound recordings can't be read by
humans (tell that to somebody like J. Lawrence Cook), they can't be
Federally copyrighted.  That led to unbridled sound-recording piracy
which couldn't be controlled by the legislation enacted by the
individual States.  Pirates simply moved their operations across State
lines to escape prosecution by any State.   It wasn't until 1976 that
this situation was successfully remedied.

So today sound recordings, including music rolls, are protected by
Federal copyright.  A principle in the 1976 act that was not contained
in the 1909 act is that no formal action is required to obtain that
Federal copyright protection.  The very fact that you have created a
work, whether it be a book, a composition, a work of art, a computer
program, or any other piece of human creativity, invests you with the
copyright for that creation and gives you control over its use and
possible distribution.

The 1976 act did away with the 1909 act's requirement that all copies
of a copyrighted work carry a copyright notice and that two copies of
the work be deposited in the Copyright Office, a department of the
Library of Congress, along with the filing of a copyright application
and the payment of a small registration fee.

So the Lady Liberty Chapter composer on whose behalf Vincent Morgan
wrote to yesterday's MMD already owns a copyright on his piano roll
(and also on the underlying musical composition or arrangement).  No
further action is required to secure copyright.  But to prove copyright
ownership and to have proof that can be used in court if necessary, he
can put a copyright notice on any copy of the roll he produces and also
register his copyright with the Copyright Office.

These actions, although not required, are actions that most authors and
publishers do take in order to protect their rights.  If there is a
copyright notice on every copy of a work released, then no infringer
can later plead innocent infringement as a defense.

My explanation, although it seems long and windy, is a vast
simplification of the issues involved with copyright, especially music
copyright.  I have been silent here about the duration of copyright
coverage, which is a complex issue, made even more complex by the
infamous Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (see another Wikipedia
article for that), which was pure special-interest legislation
introduced and passed to benefit Disney and others.

More information about registration for copyright can be had from the
Copyright Office's web site,  http://www.copyright.gov/ 

Matthew Caulfield
Irondequoit, New York


(Message sent Wed 25 Jan 2012, 18:13:05 GMT, from time zone GMT-0500.)

Key Words in Subject:  Copyrighting, Piano, Roll

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google
Loading



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2017 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                                       
Translate This Page

. .