Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info
MMD > Archives > November 2014 > 2014.11.07 > 07Prev  Next

Regulating the Duo-Art Expression System
By Adam Aceto

I have a special fondness for the so-called "triple titles."  These are
popular tunes produced in the years after the Aeolian-American merger
where one performance was coded for three reproducing piano systems:
Ampico, Duo-Art and Welte-licensee.

Having owned all three systems, worked on them, and having listened to
them side-by-side in my home, it is fascinating to me how each of the
different systems show their strengths and weaknesses so clearly when
these songs are played in this setting.

In support of John's thinking, I too have noticed that later Duo-Art
titles (post 1930, of which the "triple titles" are) played more weakly
(or perhaps I should say are coded for softer playing) than similar
titles of the earlier decade.

While I never owned one and I've never charted it's expression curve,
I always guessed that these later rolls were coded with lower volumes
because the late Duo-Art (of the 1930s, with the wrap-around tubing)
had an electric roll motor.  Given that there was no wind-motor, an
enormous consumer of suction, the suction for the entire stack and
expression mechanism in turn would have greater ability to play evenly
and without droop at even the softest settings.  Whereas in earlier
rolls, we see the need for "8"+"4" consistently in the Accompaniment
for even, mezzoforte playing, in the later rolls only "1"+"2" are
consistently called for.

In the absence of the wind motor, the "Play/Don't Play" test on the
test roll is misleading at best.  My solution on my instrument was to
regulate according to the test roll and make the playing of the
pre-1929 rolls even and good.  And then with the occasional 1930s roll,
to throw on the "Dance" switch which added the "8" accordion to the
Accompaniment and evened out the volume overall.

If you don't have the "Dance" switch you could easily add something
that would achieve the same end without altering the hardware.

Adam Aceto
Burbank, California

(Message sent Fri 7 Nov 2014, 20:00:03 GMT, from time zone GMT-0800.)

Key Words in Subject:  Duo-Art, Expression, Regulating, System

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   

Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google

CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2019 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

Translate This Page

. .