Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

Announcement: End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress

Our End-Of-Year Fundraising drive is in progress. If you haven't contributed to the operation of the MMD in the last 12 months, this would be a great time to contribute. There's a PayPal link at the bottom of each page on the website.

If you aren't sure when you last contributed, please send me a note using the contact form at the bottom of this page and I'll look you up in my records.

Thank you for your generous support!
Jody

P.S. While your support is needed and appreciated, you do not need to contribute to be a subscriber. If you have subscribed and aren't receiving your Digest, please use the contact form at the bottom of the page and let me know. Thanks!

MMD > Archives > February 2015 > 2015.02.07 > 01Prev  Next


Tempo of Wurlitzer 165 Band Organ Rolls
By Matthew Caulfield

Anybody who has played Wurlitzer 165 rolls on a dual-tracker organ
has noticed that early rolls can't be teamed up with later rolls
because of their Tempo difference.

 [ Within this context, "Tempo" denotes the speed of the music
 [ medium (e.g., feet per minute), not the musical beats per minute
 [ (the "metronome setting").  -- Robbie

Obscuring this problem is the fact that the numbering of Wurlitzer
evergreen rolls 6501 to 6537 duplicate the numbering of its early rolls
issued from 1914 to April 1918, even though the evergreens appeared in
1923.

The reason for the Tempo problem is that early rolls were cut to a
basic roll tempo that is faster than later rolls, meaning that playing
those rolls requires that fewer inches of paper per minute travel over
the tracker bar.

Rich Olsen, who arranged many good Wurlitzer 165 rolls from 2007 to his
death in 2013, had studied this tempo change and had concluded that it
took place around 1923.  Terry Hathaway's huge, new APP rollography,
now posted on the Mechanical Music Press website

  http://www.mechanicalmusicpress.com/registry/wurlitzer/mr_wapp65.htm 

contains a photocopy of a 1923 document that confirms Rich Olsen's
theory.  It is a memorandum issued to the Wurlitzer Roll Department
by General Superintendent Walter H. Wendell ordering an immediate
change in roll production methods to address numerous complaints that
Wurlitzer had been receiving from its roll customers concerning Tempo
problems.

Why was this change in its roll-cutting practice not announced by
Wurlitzer to its customers?  Beyond the fact that the instructions
issued by Wendell are very technical, Wurlitzer probably saw no need
to announce a course correction of this kind because of the company's
philosophy advertised in its Monthly Roll Bulletins, "It pays to buy
new music."  Wurlitzer didn't want its customers to continue playing
old rolls, but to toss them out in favor of the latest new hits.

Matthew Caulfield
Irondequoit, New York


(Message sent Sat 7 Feb 2015, 22:34:14 GMT, from time zone GMT-0500.)

Key Words in Subject:  165, Band, Organ, Rolls, Tempo, Wurlitzer

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google
Loading



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2017 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                                       
Translate This Page

. .