Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

Announcement: End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress

Our End-Of-Year Fundraising drive is in progress. If you haven't contributed to the operation of the MMD in the last 12 months, this would be a great time to contribute. There's a PayPal link at the bottom of each page on the website.

If you aren't sure when you last contributed, please send me a note using the contact form at the bottom of this page and I'll look you up in my records.

Thank you for your generous support!
Jody

P.S. While your support is needed and appreciated, you do not need to contribute to be a subscriber. If you have subscribed and aren't receiving your Digest, please use the contact form at the bottom of the page and let me know. Thanks!

MMD > Archives > August 2015 > 2015.08.09 > 01Prev  Next


ASCAP and Public Performances of Music
By Matthew Caulfield

I have just finished writing an article for the COAA's "Carousel
Organ" on the subject of U.S. copyright law as it pertains to
mechanical music.  It should appear in the next issue or so, and
I hope that, although I am not a lawyer, it will give some useful
guidance to the subject, which has been made infinitely more complex
by the Copyright Act of 1976, replacing the old 1909 Act, and by the
Sonny Bono term modifications that followed its enactment.

Writing about ASCAP's role in collecting royalties owed to composers
of copyrighted music when that music is performed in public made me
wonder about two things that perhaps MMDers can shed some light on.

First, have any band organ rally organizers or participants ever
heard from ASCAP with regard to royalties due for music being played
at rallies? Under the 1909 law public performance that causes royalty
liability was more narrowly defined than it is under the 1976 law.

"Playing for profit" used to apply to performances for which an
admission was charged and also performances from which an indirect
profit was realized such as background music used to attract customers
to a business or restaurant.  Now almost any public performance of
copyrighted music entails royalty payments.

Secondly, does anyone know how ASCAP estimates the amount of
copyrighted music played by an instrument when assessing those royalty
payments?  I know that most amusement parks pay an annual royalty to
ASCAP for the copyrighted music they play.  But if a park consciously
makes an effort to play public domain music -- as for example a park
that plays only the CDs and cassette tapes that Marion Roehl Recordings
used to issue containing only pre-1923 (i.e. public domain) music -- is
there any avenue of appeal of an ASCAP assessment that assumes the use
of copyrighted music?

The whole process by which ASCAP estimates the amount of music a park
uses and then nature of that music must entail a whole lot of guesswork
by ASCAP.

Matthew Caulfield
Irondequoit, New York


(Message sent Sun 9 Aug 2015, 21:52:32 GMT, from time zone GMT-0700.)

Key Words in Subject:  ASCAP, Music, Performances, Public

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google
Loading



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2017 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                                       
Translate This Page

. .