| 
| 
 Re: Transcribing Music Box Disc
 By Robbie Rhodes
 
 
 | At 9:33 AM 10/2/96, Gerard Arkenbout wrote: 
 > Robbie,
 >
 > Your email to Jack (John C. Kane) mentions an experiment in the
 > future with 2 dimension imagery, to get a precision better than
 > 0.003-inch or < 0.1 mm near the edge of the disc. This is a great
 > challenge, for how is that to be done for a 20-inch diameter
 > metal-disc for the CHORDEPHON-60 music-box. We prefer the DIAZO
 > sunlight-amonium hydroxide-vapor method, for the paper stays dry, so
 > the exposure is the right image of the disc. With a metal puncher a
 > copy of the disc, with the aid of this print, is a very good one. Also
 > the exchange of music titles will be an easy one. Because the DIAZO
 > copy can be send by letter (not electronically) to the party
 > interested. While a flatbed-scan may be transferred to paper, the
 > printer will change the dimensions of the image by heating or wetting
 > the paper with the exposure. Therefore another electronic transfer
 > method must be applicated. (may be a mathematical correction
 > during printing, for the dimensions to be achieved are known)
 >
 > With regards   Gerard Arkenbout from the Netherlands
 
 Dear Gerard,
 
 The end-result of my experiment is a computer file which contains all of the information necessary to punch an exact duplicate.  Therefore the computer file may be considered the "Master File" for that song-arrangement.  Furthermore, the music may easily be modified for smaller, or larger instruments.  For example, the computer file for punching a large music box arrangement could become -- with a bit of modification -- the master file for a new Chordephon Zither disc.
 
 I admit that it will not be possible to attain 0.1 mm resolution with a 20-inch disc -- it will be difficult to achieve with the 9-inch Stella disc!
 
 While a small disc image may be made with photographic paper, I agree that the best method for larger discs is the Diazo/ammonia method.  It will be necessary to cut the paper image into narrow segments, in order to fit in an 8.5-inch flatbed scanner.  Then the computer files must be "stitched together"; fortunately standard software programs are availble for this task.
 
 You are correct: mathematical corrections may need be applied in the case of elliptical distortion.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Robbie Rhodes
 
 
  ----------------------------------|         Robbie Rhodes            |
 | Return-Path: rrhodes@foxtail.com |
 ----------------------------------
 |  | (Message sent Thu 3 Oct 1996, 00:27:55 GMT, from time zone GMT-0700.)
 | 
 
 |  |