Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info
MMD > Archives > December 2001 > 2001.12.31 > 10Prev  Next


Should a Restoration Look Like New?
By Craig Brougher

I agree with everybody!  My motto has always been, "Just tell me what
you want it to look like."  I personally think that as long as an owner
of an old piano wants me to just get it playing like original but leave
the finish just as it is, well, I'm happy to do that too because that's
how he wants his piano to look.

I do have to warn him, however, that in the course of the rebuilding of
the rest of it, the case is bound to acquire some "yellow scratches",
as known in the touch-up trade.  Old finishes are fragile and dry, and
they will get scratched during the normal course of a rebuild.

Just a light fingernail dragged along the old finish will often do it
(which might make one wonder then what kids would do with an armload of
player rolls).  These blemishes can be obscured fairly easily as long
as they aren't deep.  The reason is that most American pianos finishes
were of shellac-based "varnish," and the limitations and tradeoffs of
this finish were all known to the trade even back then.  Lacquer was a
far superior finish, like on the pianos done in Europe.  But heck, if
some people consider refinishing a shellac-coated piano to be destroying
history, I'm not going to argue with them about that.

Then you have the people who believe that changing anything about the
piano would be destroying history.  After all, there are none of the
original materials left to use.  They are all, 100% of them (including
the leather), a modern approximation, a cheaper version with many steps
left out, or a synthesization.  So one might also use the same argument
to discount all restoration, if, in your mind, "history" is lost when
one removes the timed out materials and finishes and makes the
instrument playable and handsome again.  In which case, I wonder why
are such curators are reading this newsletter, anyway?  What we do
should be anathema to them all.

I went to a small museum once and asked the owner why none of the
instruments he had collected played.  The answer was, "That would be
changing history.  What you are looking at is an original, all the way
through."

I guess it's just too bad we don't have noses like bloodhounds, so we
could all stand there and admire the ages through its many acquired
odors (and maybe an occasional packrat) then.

Craig Brougher


(Message sent Mon 31 Dec 2001, 14:46:59 GMT, from time zone GMT-0800.)

Key Words in Subject:  Like, Look, New, Restoration, Should

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2020 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page

. .