Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

End-of-Summer Fundraising Drive In Progress. Please visit out home page to see this and other announcements:     Thank you. --Jody

MMD > Archives > January 2004 > 2004.01.15 > 03Prev  Next

U.S. Copyright Law
By Matthew Caulfield

John,  I believe that U.S. copyright law now conforms closely to U.K.
and European copyright law.  Under the Copyright Act of 1909 the United
States pretty much went its own way and chose not adhere to the Berne
Copyright Convention when it was later enacted -- differing in such
provisions as copyright duration (28 years, plus an optional renewal
term of another 28 years), requirement for copyright notice (without
a printed notice on each copy, protection was forfeited), manufacturing
requirement (the protected items had to be manufactured in the U.S.,
although there was an "ad interim" provision for items manufactured
abroad), and in other details.

The Copyright Act of 1976 changed the duration to "life plus 50 years"
(or 75 years for anonymous or corporate creation), and it subsequently,
when we finally subscribed to the Berne Convention, abolished the
notice requirement.  These changes were an attempt to bring U.S.
practice into line with European practice.

Two other important features of the 1976 act were that it abolished
all distinction between common-law copyright and statutory copyright,
eliminating the necessity of registration as a requirement of copyright
protection (i.e., the mere act of creation gives you copyright protection
of the thing you have created); and secondly, it made explicit provision
for the copyrighting of sound recordings, which were not copyrightable
under the 1909 act.

I am not up on the more recent changes to the 1976 act.  But the late
Congressman Sonny Bono -- financed, they say, by Walt Disney Studios --
got legislation passed that played havoc with the finite-term concept
of U.S. copyright theory.  I believe we have extended the term to 70
years or more.  I know that 1922/1923 was the public domain/copyright
dividing line in the year Bono did his work, and that it was advancing
each year as time passed, so that 1922/1923 would in another year
become 1923/1924, and so on at every successive 365-day passage of
time.  But we are now frozen in the 1922/1923 state until (I think)
the year 2024, when the clock will start running again on copyright

Don't ever say that money can't buy you time.

Matthew Caulfield (not a lawyer)
Irondequoit, New York

(Message sent Thu 15 Jan 2004, 14:56:19 GMT, from time zone GMT-0500.)

Key Words in Subject:  Copyright, Law, U.S

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   

Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google

CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2019 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

Translate This Page

. .