Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info
MMD > Archives > June 2011 > 2011.06.28 > 07Prev  Next


Recordo Piano is Incompatible With Recordo Rolls
By Craig Roothoff

[ Mike Walter wrote in 110627 MMDigest:

> The later Recordo systems did accommodate more possible combinations
> than the earlier system, but if you examine a roll or two, you will
> find a couple of things that are apparent.
>
> Almost all of the time there is one dominant expression hole
> perforated.  There are seldom two expression holes perforated for
> more than, let's say, three punches.  These short expression holes
> are to provide a very brief emphasis on a note or two.

Exactly.  This is even true for rolls numbered higher than 612720,
which are supposed to be for the later 16-step ("C") Recordo (per
the article "What is Recordo" by Bob Billings and Durrell Armstrong
in the old PPCo catalog).  This being the case, what is the point of
having a 16-step system if rolls are never perforated to take advantage
of this?   Perhaps my serial number information is incorrect.

> ... a small grand it was probably built to fit in a small apartment
> where a great volume of music was not needed or desired and was
> probably used as background music.

Yes.  I suspect that it was not designed to make full use of the
expression potential (unless it could use some sort of elusive 16-step
roll, which doesn't seem to exist).

> I would suggest that Craig hook up his vacuum gauge at the stack once
> more to determine if the system is providing it full potential.  By
> placing the tempo at zero and masking tape over the entire tracker
> bar, record the vacuum levels at: no intensity hole open; #1 hole
> open; #2 hole open; #3 hole open; #4 hole open; bass hammer rail
> open; treble hammer rail open."

This is what I did.  This how I determined that the expression had what
I called an "additive" effect, meaning that it is capable of 16 steps.

 [ Bob Billings wrote in 000518 MMDigest:

> If one is not familiar with the various Recordo mechanisms, the only
> way to tell for sure is to measure the stack vacuum while opening the
> expression ports.  If the vacuum increases when a high level port is
> open and a lower level one is then opened, it is a 16-step ("C").

Not necessarily.  Based on this test mine is a 16-step system.  But the
manufacturer may have not cared how the system responded to roll coding
that did not exist.

Another reason I think it was intended to be 5-step: In the drawer
there are four buttons, marked "P", "MF", "F" and "FF", which are teed
to the respective intensity port on the tracker bar.  This suggest 5
levels.  There were so many Recordo systems manufactured.  The quality
can vary.

In this case, it is a Vollmer piano with an H.C. Bay Recordo action.
Contrary to the reputation of H.C. Bay, the action is of very good
quality for a Recordo.

Nevertheless, I am making some changes that are minimally invasive to
the original system.  The main change is a cutoff pouch that bypasses
the expression system when the highest intensity is called for.  This
should achieve an effect similar to a Duo-Art crash valve.

So, the question is mainly academic at this point.  Where are the
rolls with multiple expression perforations that actually make use of
a 16-step system?  Perhaps they were only issued by a specific piano
manufacturer, like Schulz for the Aria Divina.  It would be interesting
to find out.

Craig Roothoff
Escondido, Calif.

 [ The 16-step system in the Duo-Art was patented by Aeolian.  Maybe they
 [ told the firms who made the Recordo action and rolls they should stick
 [ to the 5-level system or face a lawsuit for patent infringement.
 [ -- Editor (Robbie)


(Message sent Tue 28 Jun 2011, 15:03:09 GMT, from time zone GMT-0700.)

Key Words in Subject:  Incompatible, is, Piano, Recordo, Rolls

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page