MMD > Archives > January 1997 > 1997.01.07 > 13Prev  Next


Re: Royalties for Mechanical Music
By Andy LaTorre

In the last digest, I was intrigued with S. K. Goodman's response:

> it has been my practice to go ahead and produce the recording first,
> and if it actually sells out 1,000 copies (well below the 5,000 unit
> "demo" limit set by law), consider another 1,000 unit run.  These
> numbers are so small in the grand scheme of modern commercial music
> that it seems ridiculous to even call their issuance to the attention
> of the licensing agencies...

Well, suppose the agency gets wind of this?  Do they have the right to
slap you with a bill or fine (I heard or read somewhere that copyright
infringement fines are $10,000).  Can this happen even if you produce
only ONE unit?  Who does have the right to fine?  The government or the
agencies?  And suppose you (or I) are within the law, can you or I
afford to fight such a thing in court?

Goodman also states:

> I would suggest consulting an entertainment-industry copyrights &
> recordings attorney for the final word on this matter.

When I was in Nashville last year I consulted a phone book to this type
of attorney but could not find any listing (unless they are all music
attorneys).

By reading all of this, one can certainly see the confusion around this
issue.  Why is this so?  I believe that a central government agency
should take care of all the fees.  Having two private agencies holding
the gold coins, in this era of confusion and looseness, is an
invitation to corruption.

Composers/songwriter/producers/MIDI-ites/etc: UNITE!

Andy LaTorre¶
Orgue Mecanique¶
POB 1479, Cullowhee, NC.  28723

 [ Editors note:
 [
 [ Governments around the world today are recognizing that many
 [ bureaucratic functions are accomplished more efficiently by
 [ private contractors, with government auditors guarding against
 [ corruption.
 [
 [ Harry Fox is agent for the publishers, not the US government.
 [ At issue is the copyright law, and whether the publishers are
 [ abusing their rights under the copyright law.
 [
 [ What is this term "demo" about?  Does the law, or the publisher,
 [ in some manner give preference to "demo" quantities?  (We need
 [ a lawyer in this group, don't we!  :)
 [
 [ Robbie Rhodes

(Message sent Tue, 07 Jan 1997 14:23:28 -0500 (EST) , from time zone -0500.)

Key Words in Subject:  Mechanical, Music, Royalties

Related by Subject:
1997.01.07.13 (This article) - Re: Royalties for Mechanical Music
2004.09.22.01 - Copyrights & Performance Royalties
from Jack Perron
2003.06.15.05 - Juke Box Stamps Show ASCAP Royalties Paid
from D. L. Bullock
2002.07.17.08 - Royalties for Automatic Music in Public
from Harald Mueller
2002.07.17.09 - Royalties for Automatic Music in Public
from Nicholas Simons
2002.07.17.10 - Royalties for Automatic Music in Public
from Jeremy Brice
2002.07.16.05 - Royalties for Automatic Music in Public
from Rob Goodale
2001.11.22.04 - Copyrights & Performance Royalties
from Matthew Caulfield
2001.11.22.05 - Copyrights & Performance Royalties
from Jon Guy
1999.04.12.09 - Royalties for Publishers & Artists
from Scott Anderson
1998.04.16.11 - Royalties for Public Performance
from Andy Taylor
1998.04.16.12 - Royalties for 'God Bless America'
from Hal Davis