MMD > Archives > September 1996 > 1996.09.30 > 11Prev  Next


Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
By John Phillips

Ah, good!  Here's John Phillips' reply.  (Dan Wilson: it looks like I scored
a point here!  Is it any value?!!!  :)

Thanks for your lively notes from Oz, John.

Best wishes,  Robbie Rhodes

- - - - - -

Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 14:19:19 +1000 (EST)¶
To: rrhodes@foxtail.com (Robbie Rhodes, Etiwanda, Calif.)¶
From: John Phillips <John.Phillips@phys.utas.edu.au>¶
Subject: Re: The Worldwide Queen's English

At 01:26 AM 29/09/96 -0700, you wrote:

> In Digest 960927 John Phillips wrote, "In response to Bryan Cather's
> enquiry ..."    "Enquiry" hasn't appeared in U.S. dictionaries for
> several generations; here in "The Colonies" it's spelled "inquiry" !
> I don't know if the pronunciation is different.  (Perhaps I'll
> enquire... !)

Curses; when I looked in my Pocket Oxford Dictionary, "enquire" wasn't
there.  To my great relief, when I turned to "inquire", "enquire" was
given as an alternative spelling, but it's obviously not the preferred
one, not even in Oxford!

I enjoyed both your notes.  Regards, John.

(Message sent Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:52:10 -0700 , from time zone -0700.)

Key Words in Subject:  English, Queen's, Worldwide

Related by Subject:
1996.09.30.09 - Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
from Darrell Clarke
1996.09.30.10 - Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
from Dan Wilson
1996.09.30.11 (This article) - Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
from John Phillips
1996.09.30.12 - Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
from Gerhard Dangel
1996.09.30.13 - Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
from Darrell Clarke
1996.09.29.09 - The Worldwide Queen's English
from Robbie Rhodes
1996.09.29.10 - Re: The Worldwide Queen's English
from Robbie Rhodes