MMD > Archives > July 2013 > 2013.07.10 > 03Prev  Next


Copyright Warning at YouTube
By John Belmont

I should think that most music on piano rolls are in the public domain
(anything pre-1923 in the US).  There are claims by the Harry Fox
Agency, which was made to protect earlier works on sheet music or
the player piano or phonograph, but it never takes down videos as far
as I know.

Being a remix artist, I know all too well about the minefields of
copyright law.  Also, I would imagine that someone shooting a video
of a baby dancing to Beyoncé, or a person mixing up a celebrity's or
character's words to say other things, or someone showing off their new
piano, are not intending to "steal" a copyrighted work or offer it for
free, but merely share what they love and/or have fun with something.
In fact, it can help promote the original work, should it become
popular enough.

What Rowland Lee says is quite correct, however.  Artists who do
make money off of copyrights don't usually make a lot.  In the record
industry, most artists get a measly 13%.  The labels (the ones who do
the lobbying, mind you) get a good 63% of all the profits made from
a song.  Distributors (the people who promote and/or sell the songs on
CD/MP3/LP) get 24%.  The 13% the musicians receive is then divided up
between band members (if it is a band), with each member getting about
18%, and the rest going to lawyers, producers, managers, etc.

All in all, a musician can expect to earn about $23 for every $1000
worth of music sold.  Even big-name stars like Rihanna have been
cheated this way, with her manager taking an extra large 15% instead
of the traditional 5%.  All of this, of course, pertains to bands who
are signed by a large record label and have a reasonably successful
song/album, not YouTube hits or independent labels.

In all fairness, I would much rather deal with copyright claims in
a more civilized manner instead of legal threats.  That way, I can
understand where they're coming from, and why they want it gone,
instead of being harassed by some faceless corporation.  The Internet
is vastly different beast compared to the real world.  If a person or
corporation throws a hissy-fit over a copyright, they may well be
poking a sleeping bear.

My 25 cents.

John Belmont



(Message sent Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:08:06 -0700 (PDT) , from time zone -0700.)

Key Words in Subject:  Copyright, Warning, YouTube

Related by Subject:
2021.08.08.02 - Aeolian Organ Roll Copyright Stamps
from Kevin McElhone
2021.02.13.03 - YouTube Copyright Claims
from Christian Tedesco
2021.02.12.03 - YouTube Copyright Claims
from Art Thompson
2020.06.14.02 - Ampico Roll Date and Copyright Status
from Roger Wiegand
2015.09.24.03 - "Happy Birthday" Copyright Claims Ruled Invalid
from Matthew Caulfield
2015.09.23.02 - "Happy Birthday" Copyright Claims Ruled Invalid
from Robbie Rhodes
2014.08.14.04 - Rich Olsen Wurlitzer Rolls Copyright Status
from Gordon Ramsey
2013.07.12.01 - Copyright Warning at YouTube
from George Bogatko
2013.07.11.02 - Copyright Warning at YouTube
from Paddy Handscombe
2013.07.11.01 - Piano Roll Music Copyright vs. Public Domain
from Matthew Caulfield
2013.07.10.02 - Copyright Warning at YouTube
from Gordon Stelter
2013.07.10.03 (This article) - Copyright Warning at YouTube
from John Belmont